For the past six months, Jessica and Catarina have been working with the DAAP Library on housing their Teaching art collection, including prior acquisition and newly acquired items. This collection consists of different art prints on paper, print plates and manuscript parchment leaves in need of long-term housing. In addition to housing, this collection is used for teaching in a classroom setting and for exhibition.
Most of the collection only requires simple matting systems, but some require more intricate matting systems such as the copper plate along with its print, a project mentioned in a previous blog post entitled How many magnets is too many magnets!?.
As some of the items of this collection were being prepared to go on exhibit, we had the opportunity to create mounts for other items, such as two parchment scrolls that were included in the exhibit. This was a fun project to work on, as it required us to create a support that would secure both scrolls, while providing an elegant solution for display.
To start, Jessica created a very rough small model with mat board, polyethylene strapping, and paper (as we always do with anything new in the lab, we do love model making!!). The model provided us the visual example that we needed to create the mount for the two scrolls.
Small rough model created by JessicaSmall rough model created by Jessica
With the model in mind, we were able to engineer a good system that would provide support for the scrolls and could be used for display. The scrolls were supported with foam rolls on the inside for the rolled ends, and secured with polyethylene strapping that only touched the foam. The sections of the scrolls that were going to be displayed were also secured with polyethylene strapping that wrapped around the mat board support through slits in the board. At the bottom, the mat board extended outwards creating a small shelf to support the end of the scroll.
Scrolls mounted and ready for exhibition.Scrolls mounted and ready for exhibition.
A small “shelf” of mat board supports the bottom of the scrolls.
Catarina adjusting the strapping on the mount.
A small “shelf” of mat board supports the bottom of the scrolls.
A small “shelf” of mat board supports the bottom of the scrolls.
The foam rolls support the inside of the scrolls and are secured with polyethylene strapping.
Jessica securing the foam roll that supports the scroll.
As a result of all the mounting and matting we did for the Teaching Art collection and for the scrolls, each item is currently on display at the DAAP Library entrance case:
Current display at the DAAP Library featuring the Teaching Art Collection.A close-up of the scroll mounted on exhibition.
If you are interested in learning more about our preservation considerations for exhibition of this collection, Catarina and Jessica will be giving a short gallery talk on Tuesday, December 5th at 1pm, at the DAAP Library entrance on the 5th floor.
The Preservation Lab, a partnership to preserve and conserve the collections of the Cincinnati & Hamilton County Public Library and the University of Cincinnati Libraries, seeks applicants for a Conservation Assistant position.
The Conservation Assistant is a technician level position with on-the-job training that may appeal to emerging conservation professionals. This position will join a collaborative team of 7 full-time staff members, including conservators, a preservation librarian, technicians, student workers and volunteers to preserve collections from both institutions. The Preservation Lab staff consists of both Cincinnati Public Library and the University Library members. This position is a Cincinnati and Hamilton County Public Library position but is stationed at the University of Cincinnati West campus.
The successful candidate will demonstrate the ability to execute hands-on work with skill.
Founded in 1853, the Cincinnati and Hamilton County Public Library today is one of the busiest and most highly acclaimed library systems in the United States, providing service to over 800,000 residents through a network of 40 branch libraries, a major downtown Main Library, and a Distribution Center. CHPL holds one of the largest genealogical collections in the United States and many other specialized collections, most of which are housed in the Main library.
Congratulations are in order! We are happy to celebrate with our lab colleague, Chris Voynovich. After 25 years at the Public Library, Chris is retiring to a lovely beach house in Florida.
Chris first began his career at the library working in Shipping and Receiving. He then transitioned to Cataloging and Processing where he began his journey in material repair. He was a quick learner, able to utilize hand skills from his personal experience in metal work, graphic design, drumming, and matting at a frame shop.
Since 2011, Chris has grown his skills to preserve a WIDE variety of materials at the Preservation Lab. Chris has…
matted Ronald Regan’s jelly beans (see image below),
While he brought many skills with him, such as an ability to cut oversized mats, solder and work with metal files, his treatment skills have grown from general collections conservation to the treatment of special collections – with interests in leather, scrapbooks, and making clasps for medieval books. Treatment aside, Chris has held the esteemed title of Box-Maker Extraordinaire.
Known for his engineering feats, a few of Chris’ masterpieces can be viewed below:
As you can see, we will miss Chris’ can-do attitude when faced with any challenge. His positive outlook, efficiency (no one makes a box as fast as Chris!!), cartoons and dad jokes will especially be missed, but we are so happy for the new adventures that await him.
Please join us in celebration on Oct. 30th! RSVP to ashleigh.fergusonschieszer@chpl.org.
Ashleigh Ferguson Schieszer [CHPL] – Special Collections Conservator, Co-Lab Manager
Recently Jessica and I started working on a series of special collection items from UC Libraries’ DAAP Library. These were recent acquisitions specifically bought to be used as a teaching collection within the DAAP Library. Most items are small prints and single manuscript leaves that need to be matted for exhibition and prepared for handling during class. We have been working on these in small batches since it is a much larger collection that keeps growing.
Most of the items we have received so far have been very straightforward matting projects, however we encountered one that was puzzling and fun to work on. We received this item: a proof print accompanied by its very heavy, copper engraving plate. The print was adhered to a paper brown envelope with no information and the copper plate was also unhoused.
Proof print (left) and engraving plate (right) before treatment and housing.
The curator of the collection wanted both items to be housed together and housed in a way that would allow students to touch the items, and also be able to use them for exhibits. We decided that both items would be matted individually, and then housed together in a thin corrugated clamshell box. The most challenging part would be to create a matting system that was strong enough to secure the very heavy copper plate and elegant enough to be used for exhibition.
The print itself received minor treatment, with the backing envelope being removed and the print housed in a polyester L-sleeve mounted with photo corners.
Print housed in a polyester L-sleeve and matted with photo corners.
With the engraving plate, I needed to figure out how to create a matting system that was strong enough to hold the copper plate in place, especially if used for an exhibit where it may be propped at a slight angle. After considering some options, I created a sink mat that would secure the plate halfway, and then the rest of the sink mat would be adhered to the window mat so the copper plate, resting on a polyester tray, could be pulled out of the mat easily. How would I keep the matting system closed? ….with magnets, lots of magnets! For this project I used 24 rare earth magnets.
Copper engraving plate housed in a specialty sink mat with magnetic closures.Matting system for the copper plate – a sink mat, half attached to the back mat and half attached to the window mat, all secured closed with magnets.Copper plate slightly removed from the matting system by the polyester film tray.
This was a fun project to work on. After using 24 magnets and breaking a few in the process, the copper plate was securely housed in the sink mat, while also able to be propped up for exhibition and handled for teaching.
Before treatmentAfter treatmentThe matting system in action!
As conservation professionals at the Preservation Lab, we get to see and work with our fair share of historic, rare, and just plain interesting artifacts. I recently had the pleasure of becoming familiar with an item that is all 3 of these, and just so happens to be one of The Cincinnati & Hamilton County Public Library’s (CHPL) most prized possessions: the Fontayne and Porter 1848 Cincinnati Panorama Daguerreotype.
Cincinnati Daguerreotype Panorama by C. Fontayne and W. Porter, 1848
For those who are unfamiliar, a daguerreotype is the very first photographic process, utilizing iodine-sensitized silver plates and mercury vapors, often offering stunning detail and resolution. Currently on display in the downtown Main Library’s Cincinnati Room, the Cincinnati Panorama is no exception, and is considered one of the most detailed and vivid examples of daguerreotype photography currently in existence.
CHPL panorama plate 5 detail
CHPL panorama plate 4 detail
CHPL panorama plate 2 detail
Daguerreotype photography is not without its challenges, however. Most significant of these (at least which concerns us in the conservation field) is that daguerreotypes are extremely delicate. They scratch easily and can degrade with simple exposure to oxygen, atmospheric pollutants, and moisture. These attributes bring up a difficult question: how does one display an item like this, while also ensuring its preservation for generations to come?
Enter Ralph Wiegandt. Wiegandt is a Photograph Research Conservator who designed and installed the 1848 Cincinnati Panorama’s enclosure and display case in 2008. He routinely has performed on-site follow-up consultations in 2012, ’14, ’16, and most recently this past June with Genealogy and Local History and Preservation Lab staff. My fellow lab mate, Hyacinth, and I had the good fortune to also meet with Wiegandt on this recent visit to attend a presentation on his uniquely designed enclosure. Although the primary purpose of the visit was to discuss the enclosure, Ralph shared no shortage of information about daguerreotype plates, the photographers (Fontayne and Porter), the conditions surrounding the panorama, and much more.
Ralph Wiegandt, photo by Hyacinth Tucker
It was clear from speaking with Wiegandt that this project was one he was deeply passionate about, referring to it as “a seminal object in my career.” He spoke with excitement about the unique attributes the Cincinnati Panorama showcases, chief among them: the stunning detail and clarity. According to Wiegandt, this image is so detailed that it can be magnified up to 30x before experiencing any resolution loss. This allowed for intense digital imaging to be performed during the initial conservation of the daguerreotype in 2008. In this process, digital photos were taken from different degrees of closeness to the original image and then stitched together, creating one large interactive digital display, viewable here.
Wiegandt informed us that the 1848 Cincinnati Panorama was not the first attempt at such a picture. Just several months prior, W.S. Porter had taken another daguerreotype panorama of the Fairmount Water Works in Philadelphia.
Fairmount Water Works Daguerreotype Panorama by W.S. Porter, 1848
The detail of this image, however, is not as impressive as the Cincinnati Panorama. What can be gleaned from this fact, according to Wiegandt, is that the Philadelphia capture was a successful learning experience for Porter, and that his skills and techniques were able to improve dramatically by the time he attempted the Cincinnati Panorama with C. Fontayne.
At the time of the Cincinnati Panorama, daguerreotype photography had only existed for 9 years. Equally as remarkable as the detail these images were able to capture is the inception of this technology. Wiegandt explained how Louis-Jacques-Mande Daguerre experimented with plates of silver sensitized with iodine fumes. The idea was that the sensitized silver would be reduced as it was exposed to light (i.e., the shutters on a camera opening and allowing light from the image field to hit the plates), thus creating latent images in the silver. Although this proved to be successful, a viewable image was not detectable until a chance happening, which Wiegandt describes as “a miracle.” Legend has it that one of Daguerre’s exposed plates was stored in a cabinet, sharing this space with one other singular item: a broken instrument that utilizes mercury (such as a thermometer, barometer, etc.). Upon examining this plate, Daguerre realized the latent image was now detectable, correctly deducing that the mercury fumes had developed the film. The fumes had caused the light-exposed areas on the silver plate to form small bumps, roughly 1 micron in size, creating an instant high-resolution image. The microscopic size of these bumps means that, according to Wiegandt, daguerreotype images are an early example of what we would today call nanotechnology. (Ralph also notes the actual circumstances of its discovery are unclear since any notes from Daguerre’s studio would have been lost during a fire shortly afterwards.)
Much like the Fontayne and Porter Cincinnati Daguerreotype, the current display case is quite unique as well. As mentioned before, daguerreotypes are incredibly delicate. To successfully prevent further degradation and preserve this object for generations to come, its exposure to oxygen and other reactive gases must be severely limited. The solution that Wiegandt produced was a specialized inert gas case, similar in concept to how the Declaration of Independence is housed. The goal of this case is “to maintain a slightly elevated pressure of a non-reactive gas such that it will not put excessive strain on the seals yet will be above the potentially highest barometric pressure” (Wiegandt, 2006), thus preventing any atmospheric air from coming in contact with the sensitive daguerreotype plates.
Wiegandt’s sealed encasement design sketch provided in treatment documentation
Wiegandt chose argon to pressurize the case with as it has a better diffusion rate and is more inert than other gases such as nitrogen, all while being cost effective.
Wiegandt informed us on his most recent visit that the case is doing its job: the panorama has experienced no detectable degradation since its installation. However, this was likely his final visit to the Cincinnati Library, as he is retiring from the field. I should add that a further and perhaps more important purpose for this visit was to advise and inform CHPL (and Preservation Lab) staff to be successful in monitoring and caring for the object in his absence. Fortunately, Wiegandt was able to leave us with a wealth of information and resources that will aid in the continued preservation of this amazing artifact. With an updated preservation plan, knowledgeable staff in both the Genealogy & Local History and Preservation Lab departments, and a commitment to preserving cultural property, we can be confident the Cincinnati daguerreotype panorama will be enjoyed by library visitors for many generations to come.
This past March, at one of our Special collections meetings, the Lab received a photographic project from UC’s Classics Library. This was a large German collection comprised of 16 series, each series with approximately 300 photographs, a total of about 4800 photographs!! These are silver gelatin photographs that depict ancient sculptures. The photographs are important since in some cases they show sculptures that may have been destroyed during the WWII.
Before Treatment – Series 5 of the 16 series of photographs
Before Treatment – Original enclosure – Book board with cloth ties
Before Treatment – Curled photographs
All the photographs were curled, some showed silver mirroring, and minor tears along the edges, or creases. Most of the conservation treatment focuses on humidification and flattening of each photograph. With such a large number of photographs, the project was divided between Chris (Senior Conservation Technician), Hyacinth (Conservation Technician), and myself (Assistant Conservator).
Before Treatment – Photographs as they were received in the Preservation Lab. Overall, curled with small tears along the edges.
We each took a series of photographs to work on. Ahead of starting the project, we conducted some tests, along with Ashleigh (Conservator), to understand how long we should humidify the photographs, we create the pressing stacks that would be used for the flattening, and some guidelines that we could all refer to throughout the projects.
Before Treatment – Curled photograph, tear, and creased corners (Recto) Before Treatment – Curled photograph, tear, and creased corners (Verso)
We concluded that we would obtain the best results by only humidifying the photographs for a maximum of 20-30 mins and then pressing them. First, we pressed the photographs between pressing stacks of thin Hollytex, blotter, Rising Museum Photomount mat board and binders board for two days. Then we pressed them in a book press or under weights between Photomount mat board until the compression enclosure is created. Before humidification, each photograph was surface cleaned with a hydrophilic sponges.
During Treatment – Small batch of Photographs being humidified in a cold humidity chamber.
During Treatment – Photographs being prepared for flattening by being pressed in a pressing stack.
After being humidified, small cracks on the emulsion and small tears were repaired.
Chris is usually faster with any treatment, so his batch has been fully treated, and now he is in the process of making an enclosure, a cloth clamshell compression enclosure to ensure the photographs don’t start to curl again.
During Treatment – Chris working on the cloth clamshell compression enclosure.
I am still working on my batch. I currently have one-fifth of the photographs being pressed and the rest are awaiting humidification and flattening. This is a long project that requires constant monitoring and time for pressing, but it is so satisfying to see the photographs slowly relaxing and flattening. It will probably take us a few years or more to fully complete the entire 16 series, but once the project is complete each series will be safely housed and repair.
Before Treatment – Photographs as they were received in the Preservation Lab. Overall, curled with small tears along the edges.After treatment – Photographs have been humidified and flattened, each received minor stabilization treatment After treatment – Photographs flattened.
Back in October of 2022, The Preservation Lab had the pleasure of hosting Book Conservator, Jeff Peachey, for a week-long workshop on Conservation of Leather Bindings. One of the topics that was mentioned, but not discuss in depth, was leather facing.
No one in the lab had ever faced leather before, so Sr. Conservation Specialist, Jessica Ebert, and I decided to conduct some tests to understand the process, the best materials, and tools. With the research available, Jessica and I focused primarily on two sources, Conservation of Leather and Related Materials by Marion Kite and Roy Thomson and an article written by James Reid-Cunningham entitled Leather Rebacking, for the Seminar in Standards of Excellence in Hand Bookbinding, The Guild of Book Workers, 2013.
The primary reasons for testing out this technique was the fact that there were leather books from UC’s Archives and Rare Books Library here in the Lab for treatment and they could potentially be good candidates for leather facing.
Let the tests begin!!
Both Jessica and I chose two different withdrawn leather books to test on:
A tight back leather book
A leather book with false raised bands and a hollow tube
Catarina’s test model (tight back) before facing.Catarina’s test book model (tight back) after facing.Jessica’s test book model (tight back) before facing.Jessica’s test book model (tight back) after facing.Catarina’s test model (hollow tube with false raised bands) before facing.Catarina’s test model after the leather facing.Jessica’s test model (hollow tube with false raised bands) before facing.Jessica’s test model after the leather facing treatment.
The first step was to consolidate the leather on all the withdrawn books we were using as models. The leather was consolidated with 3% Klucel G in isopropanol. Since there were different methods shown in the available resources regarding leather facing, we decided to use two different methods for facing: facing with Japanese tissue adhered with Klucel G and facing with a Crompton heat-set tissue activated with ethanol. Trying out these two different methods would help us to understand which one of these materials would work best and cause less damage/staining to the leather.
Catarina’s Test Models
After having consolidated the leather, the spine was “divided” in two sections, top and bottom, with a small portion of the spine in between. The reason the spine wasn’t fully faced was because I wanted to see if there were any changes in the leather after being faced, removed, and reattached.
Leather consolidated with 3% Klucel G in isopropanol. For this model, since the leather was so degraded, it wasn’t possible to get the Japanese tissue to adhere with klucel G. Therefore, only the Crompton heat-set tissue was used.
For this book, the leather was very degraded, and I couldn’t get the Japanese tissue to adhere to the leather spine with Klucel G. As a result, for this model I only used the Crompton heat-set tissue method.
The adhesive on the heat-set tissue was activated by brushing on a thin layer of ethanol. Once it was activated, the heat-set tissue was placed on the spine, and with a tamping brush pressed on the leather. Using a lifting knife, I was able to remove the leather spine, leaving the middle portion still adhered to the text block for comparison.
Two portions of the spine fully removed.Leather spine removed, and two portions of the spine faced.
Once the leather spine was removed, I relined the text block spine with a reversible layer of Japanese tissue and wheat starch paste. The two portions of the leather spine were lined from the back with Japanese kozo fiber tissue and wheat starch paste.
At this point, there were two different ways to follow, I could adhere the faced spines to the text block and then remove the heat-set tissue, or I could remove to heat-set tissue first and then adhere the leather spine to the text block. I decided to first remove the heat-set tissue by activating the adhesive again with ethanol and gently removing it with a Caselli spatula. Once the heat-set tissue was fully removed and the leather was dry, I reattached each portion of the leather spine to the text block with wheat starch paste.
Two portions of the leather spine adhered to the text block spine.
For the leather book with false raised bands and hollow tube, the process was very similar. However, for this model I was able to try out both the Japanese tissue adhered with Klucel G as a facing method and the Crompton heat-set tissue.
Test book model with false raised bands and hollow tube.
The spine was “divided” in two sections: top portion was faced with Crompton heat-set tissue activated with ethanol and the bottom portion of the spine was faced with Japanese kozo fiber tissue adhered with Klucel G.
Using a Peachey lifting knife, I was able to remove both portions of the spine. On the top portion of the spine, I ended up not removing the previous hollow tube, but removed it completely on the bottom portion of the spine.
Leather spine was removed. The hollow tube was not removed on the top portion of the spine and removed completely on the bottom portion of the spine.Two sections of the leather spine faced with different methods.
Once the two portions of the spine were removed, a new hollow tube was created to adhered to the bottom portion of the text block spine. The hollow tube was mode of Griffin Mill Broadsheet 60 gm/115 gm paper. The new hollow tube was adhered with wheat starch paste.
Again, I decided to remove the facing tissue before adhering the leather spine back on. With ethanol, I was able to remove the facing tissue from both pieces of the spine. As seen in the pictures below, while removing the Crompton heat-set tissue there was some loss of the leather along the edges and where the leather was most degraded already.
New hollow tube adhere to the bottom section of the spine.
Removing the Crompton heat-set tissue with a Caselli spatula and ethanol.
Removing the Crompton heat-set tissue with a Caselli spatula and ethanol.
Each spine piece was lined on the verso with a Tengujo tissue and wheat starch paste. This provided some support to the fragile leather spines. The two pieces of the spine were then adhered back on with wheat starch paste.
Leather spine after being faced, removed, and reattached.
Leather spine after being faced, removed, and reattached.
Jessica’s Test Models
Here are a few of Jessica’s test models (she has a better eye for taking good photographs throughout the process).
Tight back leather binding before facing.
Spine faced with Japanese tissue adhered with Klucel G and with Crompton heat-set tissue.
Mid process, spine fully detached.
Two sections of the spine faced with different materials.
Tight back test model after facing.
Final Thoughts…
This was a great project that Jessica and I worked together. It was useful to test out different methods using different types of books with leathers in various stages of deterioration. We learned that Japanese tissue may not be able to be used as a facing material when coated with Klucel G, since in one of the tests I did, it did not adhere to the leather. This could lead to further testing, perhaps working with a Klucel G of a different concentration since we only used a 3% concentration for these tests. In addition, depending on how degraded the leather is, using a Crompton heat-set tissue may not be an ideal good solution for every item as it created some damage on the surface layer of the leather spine of our of the test books. Finally, at least in one of my models, the leather became darker than it was originally. There is still more testing and practice to do before we use this technique on a collection item, but this was a great place to start.
We’re excited to announce that the Madisonville branch is in its final stages to re-open their newly renovated space! Please join the library for the opening eventMarch 18th! At the event, the Genealogy and Local History Department staff member, Chris Smith will talk about Madisonville’s history from 3:30 pm – 4 pm.
During the event, the Madisonville scrapbook will be on view for festivities March 18th.
Because this material is HUGE and considered a rare irreplaceable item, both the book and cradle were hand delivered from one building to another by Preservation Lab and Madisonville staff. Below are “behind the scenes” images showing the delivery of these oversized materials.
View of book in its prior home location, recently cleared of books:
Scrapbook & cradle in room empty of booksCradle in prior locationScrapbook coverB
For transport, the oversized book was stored in a lightweight (but strong!) custom enclosure:
Two flaps of foam were first sandwiched under a flap of boardChris Voynovich closes all flapsFlaps were secured with integrated cloth ties
The custom enclosure consists of multiple light-weight layers and flaps of foam, all tied together with cotton ties, as shown in Chris’ schematic. This enclosure will be used both for transport and for long-term storage.
Once packaged, both the book and cradle were hand delivered to their new home next door:
Cradle hand delivered next door by Terry Barnum and Chris VoynovichBottom view of cradleBook strapped to dollyBook is oriented spine edge down for safe transport
The book now awaits the re-opening event while staff continue unpacking the rest of collections!
Boxes being unpacked in new spaceChildren’s area is coming together!
We hope to see you there!
Ashleigh Ferguson Schieszer [CHPL] – Rare book and paper conservator
To read about the conservation of the scrapbook and construction of the book’s cradle, please see the treatment documentation and a prior blog article titled, Madisonville Scrapbook.
As a bonus, to celebrate the completion of the oversized treatment, Chris created a comic you can fold from an 8 1/2 x 11 sheet of paper. Check out the printable file below! Instructions on how to fold can be found on the Preservation Lab’s YouTube channel video titled Preserving Scrapbooks beginning at the 10:42 time stamp.
The University of Cincinnati’s Archives and Rare Books Library owns a few cuneiform tablets that date around the 1st century BCE. Most are small enough to fit within the palm of your hand. However, the clay tablet in question measures 14 inches (W) by 14 inches (T) x 4.5 inches (D) and weighs roughly 40-50 lbs.
Assyrian cornerstone during surface cleaning
More accurately, it is thought to be an Assyrian cornerstone that dates between 860 and 824 BCE. It is described in the catalog record to be from the ruins of Calah (near Ninevah) on the Tigris River. It is likely the cornerstone of a temple or palace erected by Salmanser III, king of Assyria. The provenance of how the University acquired the tablet is uncertain.
A translation of the cuneiform writing reads, ““Salmaneser, the great king, the mighty king, king of the universe, king of Assyria, son of Asurnaserpal, the great king, the mighty king, the king of Assyria, son of Tukulbi-Ninib, king of the universe, king of Assyria, and indeed builder of the temple-tower of the city of Calah.”
Front, Raking Illumination with Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) by Jessica Ebert
Front, Normal Illumination by Jessica Ebert
Back, Raking Illumination by Jessica Ebert
Back, Normal Illumination by Jessica Ebert
After surface cleaning and digitizing the cornerstone, finding suitable storage for an Assyrian cornerstone tablet seemed like a straightforward task in the beginning. I thought, “Let’s get it off the floor, house it, and protect it from dust!” No problem, right?
But once we got the item back in the lab, the weight of the object combined with its fragility proved more of a challenge after Chris, Holly and I began thinking about how the object would be retrieved from storage and how it would be handled. Rather than being stored in specialty shelving (such as items might be in a museum), this item was a library item. We needed to fit the tablet amongst archival book shelving. We were also faced with the prospect of transporting the cornerstone up and down a flight of stairs from the secure rare book storage. There is no easy elevator access! And finally, once it was put in an enclosure, how would a librarian get it out to show researchers and students?
We decided on an industrial case with wheels that could be transported and stored anywhere. I knew I wanted a device with handles to pull the object in and out of the case, but immediately decided against the idea of ratchet straps. The threat of fracturing would be too great if the ratchet straps were over-tightened.
After careful thought (and the creation of mock up solutions!) the following custom design was created in five stages:
1. A waterproof, shock-proof rolling Nanuk 950 case (similar to a Pelican case) was purchased.
Nanuk case openNanuk case closedLabeled Nanuk case
2. The interior was customized with foam and supports.
3. The lid was fashioned with a Tyvek pillow screwed to the top with an interior Coroplast sheet.
Marking screw holesCoroplast screwed to lid inside pillowcaseSealing pillow filled with polyester
4. The cornerstone was wrapped around all sides in a foam sheet with four flaps.
Foam flaps secured with VelcroUnfolded flas
5. A cloth wrapper with custom handles was sewn to support the tablet during insertion into and retrieval from the case.
Sewing cloth wrapperDuring creation of handlesCompleted wrapper
In addition, life-size surrogate photographs were printed by Jessica Ebert and stored in a polyester sleeve within the case. These images may prove even more useful during exhibition or teaching than seeing the actual tablet as they were captured with raking light that beautifully highlights the cuneiform writing. They could even be used as an alternative to handling the heavy tablet.
To help guide future librarians on how to handle the cuneiform tablet in the future, handling instructions were provided, a handling video was created, and a QR code of the video was pasted onto the case. Check out the video below.
I was appreciative to have been able to hearken back to my object’s conservation experience working at the Musical Instrument Museum. My prior experience helped guide me to dust the tablet and store surface cleaning samples, however, this was a project that took me out of my library conservation comfort zone. The knowledge required to house such an object (and the amount of textile sewing used to create the cloth wrapper!) gave me even more appreciation for the work objects and textile conservators do to preserve our oversized and heavy materials – especially when transporting and taking them on and off display!
Ashleigh Ferguson Schieszer [CHPL] – Rare book and paper conservator
